Strong post-award management practices ensure that recipients of federal funds maintain compliance, accountability, and fiscal responsibility. Key provisions guide areas such as bonding, payment procedures, cost sharing, program income, and oversight of budgets and performance periods.
Key Insights
- Federal agencies may require bonds to protect against financial risk and promote accountability in the use of public funds.
- Recipients must manage payments, cost sharing, and income according to federal guidelines, using default methods like the deductive method when terms are not specified.
- Substantial changes to budgets or project timelines require prior approval to ensure continued alignment with program goals and proper use of federal resources.
This lesson is a preview from our Grants Management Certificate Program. Enroll in a course for detailed lessons, live instructor support, and project-based training.
Effective post-award management ensures that federal funds are used appropriately, efficiently, and in alignment with federal program objectives. The following provisions provide guidance for key financial and administrative responsibilities. Subsection 304 covers bonds.
The agency may require bonds to protect against fraud, mismanagement, or financial loss. Bonds serve as a risk mitigation tool to safeguard federal resources and ensure accountability. Subsection 305 covers federal payment.
Recipients must follow established federal payment procedures, ensuring that funds are drawn promptly and used efficiently. Timely and properly funded management reduces risk and supports program effectiveness. Subsection 306 covers cost sharing.
When an award requires non-federal contributions, recipients must document and ensure that their contributions comply with program requirements. Proper cost sharing demonstrates commitment to the project and helps leverage federal investment. Subsection 307 covers income.
Any income generated by a project, such as fees, sales, or services, must be used according to the terms of the award. Options include adding income to the project budget, applying it towards cost sharing, or offsetting program costs. Or, by default, if adding the additive method or the cost-sharing method is not explicitly stated in the contract, the default method is the deductive method.
And that's when any income generated from the grant program is less money obligated by the federal awarding agency. Once again, the default method is the deductive method of treating income. Section 308 covers budget and program revisions.
Significant changes to a project's budget or program plans require prior agency approval. This ensures that funds remain aligned with the approved objectives and that changes are documented for accountability purposes. Section 309 covers the period of performance.
Adjustment to the project's period of performance, whether it's sanctions or reductions, must be approved, justified, and documented. Proper management of the period of performance ensures that programs are completed on schedule and that federal funds are appropriately utilized. Together, these provisions create a structured framework for managing federal awards, promoting responsibility, responsible stewardship, compliance, and alignment with program goals throughout the life of the project.