Keys to Success of Quick Response Audits

Strategies for planning and executing quick response audits in federal environments

Government auditors can apply Quick Response Audit (QRA) techniques to deliver timely analysis when conditions support a fast-paced review. By limiting objectives, working closely with clients, and applying professional judgment, auditors can provide valuable findings without sacrificing quality.

This lesson is a preview from Graduate School USA's Quick Response Auditing Course.

Conditions When Quick Response is Easiest

Responding quickly is easiest under the following conditions:

  • Client or management requested engagement
  • Known or suspected problems/opportunities
  • Program, function, or activity with previous audit history
  • Clearly defined deadline or target date for completion of engagement
  • Strong support from the client or management for a quick response

Client may already know:

  • Criteria
  • Condition
  • Effect
  • Maybe Cause

Client may be seeking:

  • Effect
  • Cause
  • Recommendations

The client presents the auditor with a potential finding; the client only wants confirmation.

Objectives Can Be Limited

Have precise objectives and audit those objectives and be prepared to report what you find (be it positive or negative). 

Limit the objectives (for example):

  • To one subject
  • To one performance aspect
  • To selected finding elements

You can also defer some objectives where incremental auditing is acceptable, limit the scope of audit coverage (but scope must be sufficient to satisfy objectives), and use streamlined reporting.

Why actions to limit audit work and streamline reporting are important

  • The actions to limit audit work and streamline reporting are important
  • Satisfying objectives is time-intensive
  • Extensive scope is time-intensive
  • An involved report writing and reviewing process is time-intensive

“An awareness of potential users’ interest…can help auditors judge whether possible findings could be significant to relevant users.” Par 8.37

Interface With the Client: A Key to Success

Audits must meet user/client needs or interests:

  • Who is the client?
  • Stakeholders to consider?

Work with the client to identify:

  • The issue in which the client is interested
  • What exactly the client wants to know about that issue
  • What the client is going to do with the audit results
  • Objectives translate user needs into audit language
  • Scope of audit coverage
  • Methodology
  • Report Type (e.g., briefing)

Time Is of the Essence

  • Dynamic change demands real-time answers
  • Clients need quick solutions to save resources
  • Client should convey the desired report date
  • Auditor should meet the date if possible

Auditor has Program Knowledge

  • Familiarity with programs facilitates “quick start”
  • Auditor understands data systems/evidence sources
  • Existing working relationships with the client

Auditors should obtain an understanding of the … potential use that will be made of the audit results or report as they plan a performance audit. Par 8.36

Exercise Caution:

  • Fraud is suspected
  • Suspected violation of:
    • Statutes
    • Regulations
    • Policies
    • Contract or grant terms
  • Potential adverse action against personnel
  • Potentially sensitive or embarrassing for the agency
  • The client is not flexible

Auditors should assess risks of fraud occurring that is significant within the context of the audit objectives. Par 8.71

Avoid QRA:

  • Client insists on multiple objectives or an extensive scope
  • Client seeks documentation for adverse actions
  • There is strong resistance by activity personnel
  • Auditor’s professional judgment suggest otherwise

How Can You Use QRA Concepts?

  • To offer a new line of audits to your clients
  • To respond quickly to selected engagements
  • To broaden your understanding of appropriate nonaudit services

“The audit department must continually rethink its audits to find the approaches that add the most value.” Anthony P. Waltz, CPA, CIA


photo of Alan McCain

Alan McCain

Alan McCain is an instructor at Graduate School USA, specializing in Audit, Financial Management, and Acquisition. A retired combat veteran who served as both an Air Force enlisted member and a Navy officer, Alan brings more than 30 years of experience in federal and commercial budgeting, auditing, programming, operations, global logistics support, supply chain and inventory management, and major IT acquisition.

He possesses extensive, hands-on budget and audit experience across Federal, State, and Local government operations, including work within the Executive Office of the President and the Departments of State, Defense, Homeland Security, Health and Human Services, Housing and Urban Development, and Education, as well as the Office of the Mayor of Washington, D.C., among others.

Alan’s consulting background includes strategic planning and business development with the District of Columbia government, multiple federal agencies, Lockheed Martin, KPMG, and PricewaterhouseCoopers. He is a Certified Government/Defense Financial Manager (CGFM/DFM), holds a Teaching Certification from Harvard University’s Bok Center for Teaching and Learning, and earned an Executive MBA in International Business from The George Washington University.

More articles by Alan McCain

How to Learn Auditing

Build practical, career-focused federal auditing skills through hands-on training designed for beginners and professionals alike. Learn fundamental tools and workflows that prepare you for real-world projects or industry certification.