Providing non-audit services poses potential challenges to auditor independence, especially concerning future audit engagements. Auditors must carefully evaluate and mitigate these threats using a conceptual framework to ensure compliance with independence standards.
Key Insights
- Non-audit services are defined as professional services other than audits or attestation engagements and require careful consideration of independence threats.
- The conceptual framework assists auditors in determining whether safeguards can be applied to reduce independence threats to an acceptable level before proceeding with non-audit services.
- Audit organizations must establish policies distinguishing audit from non-audit services, ensuring that entity management assumes responsibilities when non-audit services are provided.
This lesson is a preview from our Government Auditor Level I Certificate Program. Enroll in a course for detailed lessons, live instructor support, and project-based training.
Non-audit services are professional services other than audits or attestation engagements. While these services can provide value to an entity, they may also create threats to auditor independence, particularly if the auditor later performs a GAGAS audit for that same entity.
Before providing a non-audit service, an audit organization must determine whether the service would create a threat to independence. If a threat exists, the organization must assess whether safeguards can be applied to eliminate the threat or reduce it to an acceptable level. The GAGAS conceptual framework for independence provides guidance to help auditors evaluate these situations.
If safeguards are sufficient to reduce the threat to an acceptable level, the non-audit service may be provided. If independence would be impaired, the service should not be performed. Audit organizations are responsible for establishing policies that define which services they will and will not provide.
Because non-audit services are outside the scope of audits and attestation engagements, GAGAS does not apply in the same way. As a result, a GAGAS compliance statement is generally not included when performing non-audit services.
Management Responsibilities in Non-Audit Services
When auditors provide non-audit services to an entity for which they also perform audits, they must obtain assurance that management fulfills specific responsibilities. These responsibilities help preserve auditor independence.
Entity management must:
- Assume all management responsibilities related to the service.
- Designate an individual, preferably within senior management, who possesses suitable skill, knowledge, or experience to oversee the service.
- Evaluate the adequacy and results of the services performed.
- Accept responsibility for the results of the service.
If management does not fulfill these responsibilities, the auditor’s independence may be impaired.
Applying the GAGAS Conceptual Framework
The GAGAS conceptual framework guides auditors in evaluating threats to independence when considering non-audit services. The process involves identifying and assessing threats and determining whether safeguards can eliminate or reduce those threats to an acceptable level.
If no threat is identified, the auditor may proceed. If a threat is identified, the auditor evaluates whether safeguards are available and effective. If safeguards reduce the threat to an acceptable level, the auditor documents the nature of the threat and the safeguards applied and may proceed with the service.
If the threat cannot be eliminated or reduced to an acceptable level, independence is considered impaired, and the auditor must not proceed.
This structured evaluation process ensures that audit organizations maintain independence while determining whether non-audit services can be performed responsibly.
