Federal cost principles under 2 C.F.R. 200, subsection 403, define the conditions under which expenses are considered allowable for reimbursement under federal awards. Agencies assess costs using key criteria and a structured six-part test to ensure proper stewardship of federal funds.
Key Insights
- Allowable costs must meet standards of reasonableness, allocability, consistency, and compliance with federal regulations and award terms.
- The six-part allowability test requires costs to be necessary, conform to limitations, be treated consistently, follow GAAP, avoid duplication, and be properly documented.
- Maintaining accurate records and applying uniform cost treatment across funding sources minimize audit risks and support accountability in federal spending.
This lesson is a preview from our Grants Management Certificate Program. Enroll in a course for detailed lessons, live instructor support, and project-based training.
Federal Regulations under 2 C.F.R. 200, subsection 403, is a very important section, which establishes the criteria for determining whether a cost is allowable under a federal award. Now, expenses and activities incurred by recipients are automatically eligible for reimbursement. Agencies evaluate costs based on several key factors and a six-part test to ensure federal funds are used properly.
Here are some key factors affecting allowability. It's reasonableness. Costs must reflect what a prudent person would pay under similar circumstances.
A prudent person is one who is in a state of conducting competitive business. Consider whether the cost is ordinary, necessary, and directly related to the federal award. Allocability.
Costs must be assignable to the federal award in proportion to the benefit received. Expenses supported by multiple activities must be distributed fairly among programs or projects. Consistency.
Costs must be treated consistently with how similar expenses are handled under non-federal funding or other federal awards. Uniform application prevents misuse of federal funds. Conformance with limitations.
Costs must comply with federal law, award terms, and any limitations or exclusions outlined in regulations. Expenses exceeding approved limits or restrictive categories are unallowable. Documentation requirements.
Recipients must maintain adequate records to demonstrate allowability, allocability, and reasonableness. Proper documentation is essential for audits, oversight, and accountability. Section 403 also has a six-part test for the allowability of costs.
To determine if a cost is allowable, Section 403 provides a six-part checklist. If any part fails, the cost cannot be charged to a federal award. The cost has to be necessary and reasonable for performance.
The cost must be essential to carry out the project, reflecting prudent judgment, and achieving award objectives. The cost has to conform to limitations or exclusions. Certain costs are explicitly limited or prohibited, including entertainment, alcoholic beverages, or lobbying.
Costs must adhere to award terms and federal rules. Costs have to be provided with consistent treatment. Costs must be applied uniformly across the organization, whether funded federally or non-federally, ensuring equity and compliance.
Costs have to be in accordance with GAAP. Costs must follow the Generally Accepted Accounting Principles, unless federal regulations specify otherwise, ensuring standardized financial reporting. Costs must not be doubly counted.
A cost cannot be used as both an expense on one award and as a matter of cost share on the other, ensuring proper allocation and accurate reporting. And costs have to be adequately documented. Costs must be supported with invoices, receipts, time sheets, and other proof.
Documentation should clearly demonstrate that the expense is directly tied to the award activities. By applying both the factors affecting allowability and the six-part test in subsection 403, recipients ensure that costs are reasonable, allocable, consistent, compliant, and properly documented. This reduces the risk of audit findings, enhances accountability, and ensures federal funds are used efficiently in accordance with award requirements.