Position Management Goals and Review Considerations

Evaluate the alignment between organizational workload and grade structure, accuracy of position descriptions, necessity of positions, and adherence to classification standards during comprehensive position management reviews.

Position management reviews serve as a critical tool for assessing the alignment between an agency’s workforce structure and its operational needs. These reviews promote accountability, ensure accurate position descriptions, and guide organizational consistency with classification standards.

Key Insights

  • Position management reviews aim to verify that agency review processes align with departmental policies and evaluate the match between organizational workload and grade structure.
  • Reviews focus on the accuracy of position descriptions, managerial accountability, classification consistency, and identification of positions that support career progression.
  • Targeted areas of review include evaluating high-grade non-supervisory roles, recently established positions, series classification accuracy, span of control, and the actual duties being performed compared to official position descriptions.

This lesson is a preview from our Federal Position Management Course and Certified Federal HR Business Partner (cFHRBP) Level III Certificate Program. Enroll in a course for detailed lessons, live instructor support, and project-based training.

Let's talk a little bit about position management reviews. Position management reviews are intended to check the health of an organization's position management program. Every agency should develop its own review process in line with any policies or guidelines established at a departmental level, normally in the headquarters.

And so, you want to make sure that you check to make sure that your agency has developed a review process according to the policies and guidelines that they have established. And so, I want to talk about the primary goals of these reviews. And so, these position management reviews provide for periodic management monitoring of the match between workload and grade structure and redesign positions accordingly.

They enhance management's awareness of the importance of the accuracy of position descriptions, ensuring the existence of a current, adequate, and accurate position description for each employee. Ensures managerial accountability for accuracy in assigning work commensurate with assigned position descriptions. Identifying bridge positions for career progression purposes.

Maintaining consistency of position classification with appropriate standards. Identifying problem areas or positions requiring classification action. Increasing understanding of managers' employees of the principles, uses, and objectives of position management and position classification.

And eliminating questionable positions and structures. When conducting a position management review, there are some specific targeted areas that you must look at. And so, these are very important when conducting a position management review.

And so, it should be a wide-ranging review. You should look at the number of GS-14s and 15s that are non-supervisory positions within that organization. Are they functioning at their current grade levels? You want to look at series 301 and 343 positions.

Are they properly classified into these series based on the current work being performed? Unusual or precedent-setting positions. Are they performing the duties and responsibilities outlined in the position description? You want to look at deputy and assistant chief positions. Are they really necessary and functioning as originally established? You want to look at positions established within the past 12 months.

Are the position descriptions accurately described? Are the position descriptions accurately describing the actual work being performed? You want to look at the span of control. Are spans of control too narrow, or are they in compliance with established guidelines and ranges? You want to look at the impact of the person on the job. This talks about an incumbent-only position.

Are the incumbents performing any additional high-level duties or tasks as described in their position description? You want to look at management official positions. Are the incumbents actually determining, influencing, or formulating the policy of the agency? You want to look at the overall grade structure. Does the current approved grade structure match the grade level of work being performed? And you also want to look at the areas of special interest, including test organization, current studies or projects, anything that is unique or special in the area of classification. You want to look at specific position management practices by examining average grades, the impact of current or proposed policies or procedures.

photo of Sineta Scott Robertson

Sineta Scott Robertson

Sineta Scott Robertson is an instructor at Graduate School USA, teaching in Human Resources with an emphasis on federal position classification since 2018. With nearly four decades of distinguished service in federal Human Resources leadership, she is a seasoned executive and educator recognized for her expertise in Title 5 HR, workforce planning, organizational design, and employee engagement.

She has dedicated her career to advancing strategic human capital management across Cabinet-level agencies, serving as both a transformative leader and trusted advisor to senior executives and policymakers.

Throughout her federal career, Sineta has held pivotal leadership roles at the U.S. Department of Transportation, Department of Housing & Urban Development, and Department of Agriculture, where she guided national HR policy, labor relations, workforce innovation, and program oversight. Notable achievements include leading the Department of Transportation’s efforts to become a “Telework Ready” agency, implementing its HR Accountability and Pathways Programs, and spearheading process improvements that significantly reduced error rates and improved performance management outcomes.

In addition to her government service, Sineta has extended her expertise to the classroom as an Adjunct Human Resources Instructor with Graduate School USA, where she equips HR professionals, supervisors, and executives with practical and technical knowledge in federal human resources systems, policies, and practices.

In 2014, she founded Perspectives for Peace, LLC, a consulting and Christian coaching practice. Through this work, she partners with organizations to strengthen HR effectiveness and provides faith-based executive and life coaching, helping leaders align purpose, performance, and peace.

Her career is marked by a commitment to people—helping agencies build high-performing, motivated workforces while guiding individuals to unlock their potential and live with clarity of purpose.

Sineta holds a master’s degree in Christian Counseling from Newburgh Theological Seminary (2024) and is a Doctoral Candidate in Christian Counseling (expected 2026). She also earned her Bachelor of Science in Biblical Studies from Washington Baptist Theological Seminary.

A respected professional, mentor, and faith-driven leader, Sineta Scott Robertson continues to merge her passion for organizational excellence with her calling to serve others through coaching, teaching, and ministry.

More articles by Sineta Scott Robertson

How to Learn Position Classification

Build practical, career-focused position classification skills through hands-on training designed for beginners and professionals alike. Learn fundamental tools and workflows that prepare you for real-world projects or industry certification.